Essential to anyone in the current renewables industry, Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) are a topic one should always keep in mind when adding revenue stability to assets.
Power Purchase Agreements can be a very powerful tool for companies looking to reduce their electricity costs while offsetting greenhouses emitted during their operations. Being one of the most efficient and affordable ways to include renewable energy in your company strategy, these agreements often seem like a complicated process that requires a lot of time and expertise. In this guide, we will answer many common doubts about PPAs and make sure you understand what to look out for when entering one.
What is a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)?
An electricity supply agreement between two parties, usually between a electricity producer and an offtaker (direct consumer or trader), in which the price, structure, and duration of the electricity supply are defined. Direct consumer offakers tend to close physical PPAs and traders usually undergo financial PPAs. But, why should they?
Three main reasons why to close a PPA
- Offset carbon emissions from operational activities
- Reduce electricity and Guarantee of Origin price exposures
- Reach and communicate sustainability goals to customers and stakeholders
The reasons listed above help us understand why PPAs are becoming increasingly popular among corporations seeking a sustainable outlook. Further, as PPA structures often become more complex as electricity markets evolve, we will walk you through the most common types and structures.
Types of Power Purchase Agreements
Through a PPA, a corporate off-taker enters into a long-term agreement to take part or all of the energy produced by a renewable energy generator at a predetermined price per production unit (MWh), structure and duration, usually ranging between 5 to 15 years. Within Physical PPAs, there are three categories of contracts, with the main difference being how the energy provider agrees to supply a client with electricity.
On-site PPA: Here the buyer has direct access to electricity supply through its close physical proximity. No public grids are required to transport the electricity, often avoiding grid fees, which make these types of agreement financially attractive.
Off-site PPA: In this case, the renewable energy generator is not located at the buyer's site. Electricity will be transported directly through public grids.
Virtual PPAs (or Synthetic PPAs)
In a Virtual PPA, there is no physical supply of electricity between the supplier and offtaker. Instead the electricity is sold directly to the market at the spot price. The electricity producer settles the amounts with the offtaker, which depend on the variations between between the spot price and the PPA price.
Without an actual physical delivery between the contracting parties, Virtual PPAs serve customers from multiple sites, who aren’t confined to a given energy market. Seen as more flexible, Virtual PPAs are a cost-effective option since there aren’t dispatch costs and no limits on load points.
Having sorted out the differences among PPAs types, one must also be aware of the existent hedging structures and what implications these might have on revenue risks.
The different volume structures of PPAs
Various hedging structures amount vary in terms of volume and price risk. Volume risk entails carrying the risk of a renewable energy project producer less than the expected amount, while price risk defines, what party carries the risk of spot price variations. The following table defines the risks and return each structure traditionally carries.
|Hedge computation||% x Actual Production||% x Forecasted Production||% x Forecasted Production / 365 x 100|
|Volumn risk carrier||Offtaker||Producer||Producer|
|Price risk carrier||Offtaker||Producer/Offtaker||Producer/Offtaker|
In the example below you will be able to observe how different hedging structures might impact the revenues of a solar PV project based in Germany. We will show you how under a stressed scenario in which the actual production is lower than the forecasted production, the revenues for each hedging structure look like. In addition, we will also decipher the formulas to be used to calculate the hourly revenues under each hedging structure. In this scenario, the actual hourly production for a specific day is 85% on a linear level of the forecasted hourly production. Each hedging structure assumes an 80% hedge, which results to the committed production. The Spot Prices are usually referred to as country/market specific intraday prices.
Pay as Produced
Formula: (Actual Production x Hedged Production x PPA Price) + (Actual Production x (1 - Hedged Production) x Spot Price)
The offtaker agrees to purchase a percentage of the actual produced electricity. In this structure, the electricity supply variations risk, also called volume risk, is born by the offtaker.
Due to its simplicity and risk properties, it is usually a preferred structure for sellers and banks.
Formula: ((Forecasted Production x Hedged Percentage x PPA Price) + ((Actual Production - Forecasted Production) x Spot Price)
The offtaker agrees to purchase a percentage of the forecasted electricity production on an hourly basis (the committed production).
In this case, the volume risk, is born by the seller. In addition, the seller bears the price risk during periods where the actual production is lower than the committed production. This structure is becoming more popular among renewable technologies such as PV solar, where electricity supply variations are relatively low.
Formula: (Actual Production - Committed Production) x Spot Price + If(Committed Production >= Actual Production; (Committed Production - Actual Production) x PPA Price; Committed Production x PPA Price)
The offtaker agrees to purchase a fixed amount of electricity production throughout every hour of a month/year (monthly and yearly baseload PPAs).
The seller undergoes electricity price risk in periods where the actual production is lower than the fixed production. This structure is most commonly seen in renewable technologies such as wind onshore.
Leveraging a PPA to a company’s benefit
At this stage, we can assume that Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) are a great way to reduce volume and price risks within the electricity market, but do you know how to maximize the benefits of these agreements?
The commercial energy supply market is highly competitive, with a multitude of providers offering a large range of products, services, and tariffs. In order to select the best value for a specific renewable energy project and the electricity generator risk appetite, it is important to efficiently and transparently evaluate every option.
Synertics proven PPA Evaluation tool will enable you to focus on stabilizing and maximizing asset revenues, while comprehensively understanding the inherent risks of various PPA options. It is a comprehensive, scalable, and easily manageable tool that will allow your organization to professionalize and standardize PPA tenders while transferring knowledge within your organization. It was built with the purpose to serve transaction, asset, and portfolio managers throughout the lifecycles of renewable energy assets (acquisition, operation, and exit).
As solar and wind technologies play an increasingly relevant role in generation mixes, understanding various revenue hedging options through power purchase agreements becomes empirical. Synertics PPA Evaluation Tool helps transaction, asset, and portfolio managers transparently and efficiently evaluate revenue and risk relationships of various PPA options to stabilize and maximize the value of assets.
Synertics drives productivity in the energy industry through data-driven and digital solutions. The PPA Evaluation tool transparently evaluates the risk/return tradeoffs of various PPA offers and allows for an efficient transfer of knowledge. It currently operates in the German, French, Portuguese, Spanish, and Greek markets.